"So Troy, all this crap you're pulling won't hurt me 5 years from now, right? 'Cause I can keep my mouth shut if you can." |
As it is, the NCAA states:I could care less about vacating past wins. We all know that's crap, and doesn't really mean anything other than taking down a few banners and returning (selling on eBay?) a few trophies and rings. But the Big Ten conference championship and bowl bans could be very huge for the football program. That would mean even though Ohio State could win the Big Ten East division over Penn State or whoever, that division runner-up would go to Indianapolis for the title game. The bowl ban is what we usually know about it, less exposure and less time practicing. Plus, it looks really bad for recruits to not go to a bowl game, even if for only a year.
Tressel was guilty of ethical misconduct when he knowingly provided false information to the NCAA in certifying that he knew of no potential violations by his players and failed to inform OSU officials.
Ohio State fielded ineligible players last season when starting quarterback Terrelle Pryor and others competed despite Tressel’s knowledge of their misconduct. NCAA bylaws call for immediate suspensions.
Here’s how things stand in terms of the expected punishments on top of what has already been dealt out.
- The Buckeyes will not likely have to vacate their win in the Sugar Bowl, as the NCAA reinstated the guilty players eligibility.
- The Bucks will likely have to vacate all of their other 2010 season wins, and vacate their Big Ten Championship.
- Ohio State will likely face a Big Ten conference championship ban, and bowl ban, for 2011-2012.
There will surely be much more of this story. If anything drastically changes, we'll update you all. But for now, this all seems pretty self-explanatory until a final punishment is issued.
Follow LBU on Facebook and Twitter. Subscribe to Linebacker-U.com by Email
0 comments:
Post a Comment
Linebacker-U.com